Today, I have some new
comments about Ian Wrigley's "business". Every few months, I take a
look at my blog and Enigin's practices (not more often, as I'm quite busy
running my business).
Last week, I found the
URL http://www.enigin.net with interesting information.
But before going ahead, I
just summarize what my blog is all about:
- I bought an
Enigin Distributorship License back in 2009, I followed the training in January
2010 and then, I found that Enigin's proposal is not realistic and provokes a
very high percentage of failure rate among its customers.
- Once I realized that it
clearly looked as a clear case of ripoff, I asked them to return my money
back. They obviously didn't do it and instead, they said that "I was the
problem" for not being able to implement their business model.
- At some point, I concluded
that the best I could do as a honest person, wouldn't be any more to try
recovering my money back but trying instead to avoid other honest entrepeneurs
to bury their money in this ripoff scheme. If I would still try to recover my
money, Enigin's Directors would then have an excuse to say that I was
"blackmailing" them. But thanks God, I have money enough to drop any
money claims and concentrate in trying to avoid other honest entrepreneurs from
being cheated.
Now I come back to
the www.enigin.net post. I'll copy their claims (Home Page has been
prepared and approved by the Board Of Directors” followed by my comments (I
recommend you to first read their home page):
"Clearly explain the
company’s radical change in focus and the reasons for it."
Why should Enigin do a
"radical change" if their business model was fine? My opinion: They
are scared about being sued by many "licensees" like myself and many
others. Also, they are being hurt by so many complaints from former licensees
Explain why Enigin would appear
to have more negative listings compared to the average company search, and why
the world’s (Forbes surveyed) most respected companies have considerably more,
indeed some have hundreds, of rip-off reports against their name. No comment.
Why did Enigin do a U-Turn on a
profitable Biz-Op model? My comment: Why
did they do a “U-Turn” if their business proposal was realistic and honest? In
my opinion, they are trying to survive to the many claims they are getting from
around the world.
While there has been some issues
from a handful of people resulting from the former ‘Biz-Op’ model,
notwithstanding this it should be noted we do have many, MANY, successful
distributors and delighted customers both in the UK. As I already mentioned in previous posts, I offered
them to stop my claims if they could prove to me that they had even just ONE
successful licensee in Spain. NO WAY!
Next time, I'll comment on their other statements. They even mention my person and my comments! Should they be concerned about a humble Spanish businessman if their business proposal was honest?
Kind regards to all the persons that, thanks to this information, are dodging Enigin's "business proposal".
